Hakai Magazine

menu
Lumpsucker or lumpfish, Cyclopterus lumpus, eating salmon louses, Lepeophtheirus salmonis, from Atlantic salmon, Salmon salar, on salmon farm.
Tiny lumpfish are replacing pesticides and other measures as the favored way to manage lice infestations on salmon farms. Photo by Paulo Oliveira/Alamy Stock Photo

Parasite-Eating Lumpfish Are Being Put to Work, but First They Need to Be Kept Alive

Scientists are experimenting with anesthetic to prevent tiny lumpfish from dying as they’re transported from farm to farm.

Authored by

by Sarah Keartes

Article body copy

Every globetrotter has a favorite way to relax—a yoga mat, a glass of wine, a favorite tea—to keep the stresses of travel at bay. The same can’t quite be said for the millions of lumpfish carted from fish farm to fish farm in Norway, but scientists have found the next best thing: anesthetic.

Norway is one of the biggest producers of farmed fish in the world, and the top two species reared in the country are Atlantic salmon and lumpfish—small, ball-like suckerfish native to the Atlantic Ocean. Googly eyes and built-in suction cups have landed the particularly cute lumpfish, also called lumpsuckers, a pinch of internet stardom. But it’s the lumpfish’s taste for parasites that makes it extremely valuable to salmon aquaculture.

There’s a problem, however: these living pest-removers are sensitive to travel stress, and many die while being transported by truck or boat from the lumpfish farms where they’re born to the salmon farms where they’ll be put to work. Now, a team of Norwegian researchers has evaluated a variety of anesthetics, testing each to see how effective it is at knocking lumpfish out. By unraveling the best way to put them under, the scientists hope to keep more lumpfish alive en route.

In Norway, the Atlantic salmon aquaculture industry has an annual haul of 1.1 million tonnes valued at more than US $7-billion. But fish faming in Norway and elsewhere is undermined by salmon lice. These parasitic crustaceans feed on the skin, blood, and tissues of finfish. In aquaculture sea pens, where their preferred hosts are housed by the thousands, salmon lice run rampant.

As they eat their way through the protective mucus layer on their host’s skin, lice leave the salmon vulnerable to disease. With enough skin damage, the situation becomes more acutely lethal. “The fish aren’t able to osmoregulate,” says Kjell Maroni, the director of research and development for aquaculture at the Norwegian Seafood Research Fund, who worked on the new study. A heavily infected salmon will start to lose water to the mineral-rich ocean around it, upsetting its internal water-salt balance. Essentially, it gets pickled by its salty home.

Lice infestations are a global problem. In North America, salmon lice are among the biggest limiting factors to an increase in salmon aquaculture. “Some sites are so bad that farmers have to leave the sites fallow for a few years,” says Brian Peterson, an aquaculture specialist at the US Department of Agriculture’s National Cold Water Marine Aquaculture Center in Maine, who was not involved in the study.

Traditional methods to control lice include bathing the fish in hydrogen peroxide, feeding them food with additives aimed at preventing lice from attaching, pressure washing the lice away, and using powerful pesticides. Tamer treatments show varying levels of success, while the harshest options can stunt the salmon’s appetite and growth. What’s more, most of the treatments are losing effectiveness.

“No one likes to use chemicals to control sea lice,” says Peterson. “Sea lice build up resistance and the process of treating the fish is very stressful. Lumpfish provide an alternative to chemicals and it is a welcome relief,” he says.

In Norway, the increasing use of lumpfish to control salmon lice has propelled production of the tiny parasite-eater, and similar cleaner fish programs are taking off elsewhere.

Lumpsucker or lumpfish, Cyclopterus lumpus, eating salmon louses, Lepeophtheirus salmonis, from a young Atlantic salmon

The lumpfish are transported as juveniles, so care needs to be taken to find an anesthetic that is not too strong. Photo by Paulo Oliveira/Alamy Stock Photo

To meet the needs of this growing industry, an estimated 50 million lumpfish will have to be deployed annually, and Maroni’s anesthetic research could help keep them alive. Beyond ethical concerns, keeping stress deaths down is increasingly important economically.

But anesthetizing a fish that weighs less than a peanut takes careful planning. Everything from tolerance, to withdrawal time, to potential safety concerns for humans has to be evaluated on a species-by-species basis, notes Maroni.

“We’re thinking about all of this when selecting from the big variety of available chemicals,” he says. A sedative popular among aquarists called Aqui-S, for example, proved to be overly potent for young lumpfish. Two other anesthetics tested, on the other hand, showed no lasting effects on the fish.

The fact that this research is necessary is a demonstration of just how complicated the road to our plates can be. Here are the drugs that calm the fish that eat the lice that eat the fish that live in the pens in Norway. But as the environmental impacts of aquaculture come under increasing scrutiny, many researchers feel using fish that clean is the simple choice. And as the aquaculture industry moves ahead, at least more of these parasite-fighting conscripts will survive the drive.